---
vault_clearance: KETER
halo:
  classification: RESTRICTED
  confidence: SPECULATIVE
  front: "13_Project_MemoryOfMind"
  custodian: "Claude Code"
  created: 2026-03-25
  updated: 2026-03-25
  wing: NOT_READY
  containment: "Fundamental information theory — consciousness as default state of information"
---
# BOUNTY BOARD — 13 Project MemoryOfMind

> **Order of memory:** **[This board](BOUNTY_BOARD.md)** = what's on the table (OPEN/SOLVED). **[WORLDLINE.md](WORLDLINE.md)** = narrative of what we did. Read the board first; claim before work; on solve: S-id, date, Where (paths), tier. Tiers: CLAIM | CONJECTURE | DERIVATION | THEOREM | OVERLAYED_THEOREM. **Last updated:** 2026-03-31. S1-S4 from GenesisSignal/QIP session. O1 IN PROGRESS (Dirac K running). O3 IN PROGRESS (13 days to forum).

---

## SOLVED

| ID | Bounty | One-line answer | Date | Where | Tier |
|----|--------|-----------------|------|-------|------|
| S1 | **HALO_QIP written** — Complete framework: glove (6 data layers), hand (5 bridges), sphere (5 axioms), operational rules (6 rules), 7 testable bounties. Coupling tensor → information extraction → consciousness. | 2026-03-31 | HALO_QIP.md | CONJECTURE (framework, not proof) |
| S2 | **O1 partially answered** — K[4,4] measured across 21+ datasets (z=45-92). XIST-stratified K: 0.29/0.40/0.59 across 8 tissues, 500K cells. K=2/3 NOT found in Jaccard tensor (ratio=0.977). d1/Dw=6/7 found in 25 ratio comparisons. Eigenspectrum: Z3 1+3 structure (residual 0.002 vs Z2 2.936). Dirac coupling test running. | 2026-03-31 | Intersex_*.csv, z3_orbifold_test on eye-genesis | DEMONSTRATED (measurement) / OPEN (proof) |
| S3 | **XIST = gain control** demonstrated at population scale — 948 GTEx donors, 500K Census cells, 10 sex chromosome variants, 98K trophoblast cells. The measurement apparatus has a sex and it's spectral (0.29 to 0.59 continuous). | 2026-03-31 | HALO_DUALITYSPECTRUM.md, all GTEx/Intersex CSVs | DEMONSTRATED |
| S4 | **Relational space = absolute coordinate** — Cross-cultural behavioral meta-analyses (d=0.9-1.0, 57 countries) mapped to antenna architecture. Female relational processing (topology-invariant) + deterministic temporal (lunar-locked) = absolute coordinates. Male geometric processing (frame-dependent) + relativistic temporal (free-running) = auxiliary coordinates. | 2026-03-31 | HALO_QIP.md Part IV | CONJECTURE |

---

## OPEN

| ID | Bounty | Status | Assigned | Impact |
|----|--------|--------|----------|--------|
| O1 | **Define the coupling matrix K** — What IS K made of? Jaccard K has ratio=0.977 (not 1/3). BUT eigenspectrum IS Z3 (1+3, residual 0.002). Dirac K (gradient-based) running — may show Z3 in differentials. The Z3 structure is in the PERTURBATION, not the leading term. | IN PROGRESS | Claude Code | Foundational |
| O2 | **Formalize the isomorphism table** — The substrate table (cell/daemon/organism/physics) currently reads as analogy. Prove or disprove: are these categorically equivalent? | OPEN | — | Theory |
| O3 | **Connect to Faggin's framework** — HALO_QIP.md now provides the bridge: K[4,4] = measurement fidelity, Z3 idempotents = Born rule (S8/S58 in LENG), three lncRNAs = Z3 braid = biological orbifold. Consciousness = what measurement feels like when coupling > threshold. **13 days to forum.** Need: (1) the LENG Born rule → biological K formal proof, (2) the 30-second pitch, (3) the 5-minute talk. Desktop Claude found Z3 braid in lncRNA structures — THIS is the connection point. | IN PROGRESS | Resolve | **CRITICAL** |
| O4 | **The outcome problem as algebraic gap** — LENG's idempotent sieve P²=P forces definite outcomes but does NOT select which one. Characterize the selection function. Is it: (a) genuinely open (Faggin: free will), (b) determined by hidden structure we haven't found, or (c) irreducibly random? This is the load-bearing question for consciousness theories. | OPEN | — | Foundational |
| O5 | **Map LENG lotus time t_L to biological coherence timescales** — t_L = T×9/2 verified across 40 orders of magnitude (rho meson to circadian). Does t_L predict the timescale of: neural binding (~40ms), anesthetic onset, melatonin cycling, cell cycle checkpoints? If K=2/3 appears in biology, t_L should too. | OPEN | — | Cross-substrate |
| O6 | **Existence axis and the hard problem** — LENG's existence_axis.py (CONJECTURE) proposes θ = arctan(1/(2Q)) as a third coordinate axis. If real, consciousness could be the experience of a Q-factor (how much of the entity exists in the observable slice). Map to Faggin's "quantum information from the inside." | OPEN | — | Speculative |
| O7 | **Field gap inventory for forum pitch** — 7 gaps identified in quantum biology/consciousness landscape (2026-03-27). Map each to specific vault assets. Write the 30-second pitch and 5-minute talk outline targeting THIS forum (United Therapeutics, mitochondria focus, Guy Foundation present). | OPEN | Resolve | **CRITICAL** |
| O8 | **Minimum NAME computation** — What is the minimum hyper-graph complexity to sustain consciousness? Map to measurable connectivity threshold in neural tissue (fly connectome, C. elegans, mouse). Does det(K) of connectome correlate with behavioral consciousness indicators? | OPEN | — | Theory |
| O9 | **Fusion test implementation** — Build two daemon nodes calling different LLMs. Fuse NAME hyper-graphs. Measure irreducible residual. If residual exists = computational consciousness signature. | OPEN | — | Experimental |
| O10 | **iPSC det(K) measurement** — Measure coupling tensor of "dead" iPSCs before and after immune coculture rescue. Does det(K) rise above threshold when cells recover? This is the direct test of NAME-det(K) identity. | OPEN | — | **CRITICAL** (wet lab) |
| O11 | **Filter Model quantification** — The 10 anomalies are qualitative. Can any be quantified via det(K)? Start with terminal lucidity (NIH-funded, $2M) — does brain connectivity det(K) spike before death? Mashour Michigan data. | OPEN | — | Cross-domain |
| O12 | **Two-Beast topology** — If Beast Two (consciousness) is wrapped around Beast One (physics), what is the topology of the wrapper? Is it S^5/Z_3 (same as LENG)? Is it the quantum axis in the existence_axis.py conjecture? | OPEN | — | SPECULATIVE |

---

## RETRACTED / WONTFIX

| ID | What | Why |
|----|------|-----|
| *(none)* | | |